<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jobs 4 Diversity &#187; Employment background check</title>
	<atom:link href="http://articles.jobs4diversity.com/blog/tag/employment-background-check/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://articles.jobs4diversity.com</link>
	<description>Just another Local Careers - Local. Regional. National. weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 21:33:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Employment Background Check Procedures Diversify</title>
		<link>http://articles.jobs4diversity.com/blog/employment-background-check/</link>
		<comments>http://articles.jobs4diversity.com/blog/employment-background-check/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jencarpenter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment background check]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.jobs4diversity.com/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New pieces of legislation are being proposed in an effort to make employment background check procedures more friendly to a diverse workforce.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission recently introduced an initiative dubbed E-RACE, or Eradicating Racism and Colorism from Employment. Through that effort, the EEOC has found that employer policies on criminal and credit histories may [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-8" title="diversity" src="http://articles.jobs4diversity.com/files/2010/01/diversity2.jpg" alt="diversity" width="200" height="200" />New pieces of legislation are being proposed in an effort to make <a href="http://employeescreen.com/preservices.asp">employment background check</a> procedures more friendly to a diverse workforce.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.eeoc.gov/">Equal Employment Opportunity Commission</a> recently introduced an initiative dubbed E-RACE, or Eradicating Racism and Colorism from Employment. Through that effort, the EEOC has found that employer policies on criminal and <a href="http://www.employeescreen.com/articles/2009/02/background-checks-and-your-credit.html">credit histories</a> may have an adverse impact on certain individuals, particularly those of African American or Hispanic descent.</p>
<p>As a result of that initiative, according to an article by <a href="http://www.hreonline.com/HRE/index.jsp">Human Resource Executive Online</a>, many employers have seen an increase in EEOC requests for information concerning background check procedures and policies, which has led to an increase in lawsuits.</p>
<p><span id="more-7"></span></p>
<p>The EEOC vs. Freeman lawsuit filed in September 2009 alleged that the company's use of credit and criminal history checks continues to have a significant disparate impact on African American applicants, while criminal history checks specifically have an adverse impact on Hispanic and male applicants.</p>
<p>The previously-filed EEOC vs. Peoplemark lawsuit based on complaints from African American applicants alleged that the company's policy denies employment to any person with a criminal record, which has a disparate impact on African American applicants.</p>
<p>Credit reports, which can have an adverse impact on any job seeker, are the focus of the <a href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h3149/show">Equal Employment For All Act</a>, a proposed bill sponsored by <a href="http://cohen.house.gov/">Rep. Steve Cohen</a>. That bill would amend the <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/statutes/031224fcra.pdf">Fair Credit Reporting Act</a> to ban employers from using only credit reports to make hiring or promotion decisions.</p>
<p>Two states - Washington and Hawaii - have already adopted laws that restrict the ability of an employer to rely on an employee's or applicant's credit history when making personnel decisions.</p>
<p>In Washington, employers can only obtain credit information for employment decisions if such information is related to the job. In Hawaii, employers can only conduct a credit check if such information has a direct relationship to an occupational qualification and a conditional job offer has already been made.</p>
<p>A bill proposed in Connecticut would require employers to prove the necessity of implementing a credit check. In Wisconsin, a bill has been proposed that would place credit history checks among the unfair discriminatory employment practices prohibited by state law, except when such a check is directly related to an employee's job.</p>
<p>Similar bills have been proposed in New York, Missouri, Ohio, New Jersey and Michigan. A bill passed by both the <a href="http://articles.californiajobs.com/employee-background-checks/">California</a> House and Senate was later vetoed by <a href="http://gov.ca.gov/">Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.jobs4diversity.com/blog/employment-background-check/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

